Friday, April 1, 2016

Paper-5 Narrativetechnique in Frankenstein

Umaba B
Roll No: 15
Topic:  Narrative technique in Frankenstein
Paper No:   05( The Romantic Literature)

to evaluate my assignment click here

Narrativetechnique in Frankenstein

Frankenstein is a novel with a complex narrativestructure. the gothic  novel Frankenstein , or the modern Prometheus is the result of MaryShelly’s travels to Geneva , Switzerland with her future husband P.B.Shelly ,Dr.john polidori and lord Byron , themselves famous authors , and an entertaining contest between those friends about who could write the best horror story ,convinced of a nightmare after reading German ghost stories by the fire and conversing about Darwinism , occult ideas ,galvanism and science , the only nineteen year old Mary shelly put this piece of art down  on paper and published it anonymously.
 In the core of the novel the creature‘sstory ispresented to us framed victor Frankenstein’s story which itself isunframed by Robert Walton’s epistolary narrative. The overall structure of the novel is symmetrical it begins with the letters of Walton, shifts to victor’s tale, then to the creature’s narration, so as to switch to victor again end with the records of Walton. In this manner reader gets different versions of the same story from different perspectives. Mary Shelley’s rather atypical approach not to stick to only one narrator and one defined narrative situation throughout the book creates various impressions on the reader of the novel. The narrative situation of a text describes the structure of how the content,plot, characters and events are being mediated to the reader and is often referred to as the point of view. The narrative situation is one of the main categories in literary analysis.
The novel opens with an epistolary form and in a sense, this continues for the entire novel. It is easy to forget that everything in the novel is told through Walton’sletters to his sister. Victor tells him of his own misery and also relates the creature’s tale to Walton. This shows shelly makes use of embedded narratives in the novel- both victors story are embedded within Walton’s letters.so this sets Walton up as our main narrator and source of information thought the novel. He’s an interesting character, and arguably very similar to victor. Furthermore as we get deeper and deeper into the embedded narratives, we distance ourselves from the original word of Walton, even though he is still guiding the entire novel. By the time we are at the heart of the novel, and the creature is giving us itstale, we are right in the middle of all the embedded narratives. This narrative distancing May be reflective of other ‘distances’ in the novel ‘it may reflect the geographical distance and how all three characters are isolated in their own ways, it may reflect the moral distance between victor and his fellow men or it may reflect Shelley’s desire to be distance from any sort of female voice in the novel- perhaps in fear that a female voice would be seen to reflect her own views and beliefs, which would arguably be frowned upon at the time of writing. By escaping into the multi- layered narratives of three male characters.
It is also interesting to note that creature’s narrative is heart of the novel. It is at very centre. This could be suggestive of many things. Perhaps by having the creatures tale at the heart of the story, shelly is suggesting that the creature is an integral part of all of us .perhaps shelly is suggesting that the creature reflects the other two characters and serves as a ’mirror’  being slotted in between victor and Walton’s narratives .
The three narratives are also very similar they all warn of certain dangers such as overreachingambition, andthey all appear to highlight male dominance and quests where as women are pushed to the side . Walton uses the women in his story-sister- as his audience .similarly, victor relegates Elizabeth to be a correspondent rather than a companion. And the creatures yearns for a female companion that he is never given. Considering that Shelly’s mother,MaryWollstonecraft, was an advocated of feminist philosophy, it seems odd that Shelley has mistreated women in such a way in her novel. A theme that is echoed throughout all three narratives. But the absence of the women is one of the males have tragic stories – perhaps men are too hung up on their own ambitions and desires for power. Furthermore, victors tale is strangely feminist it subverts the female role and presents victor as a warped mother figure.
The narrative structure of Frankenstein also arguably suspends the reader’s disbelief  at the seriously unlikely events of the novel . by using embedded narratives and employing these narrative so carefully and delicately , shelly is able to bridge  asignificance gap betwwen what is believable and what is not . if this story was a told from one long narrative perspective, it wouldn’t be long before we start to think ‘ this is just ridiculous’.but by putting unbelievable  character of creature against victor and putting victor’s unbelievable situation against the believable character of Walton, each narrative seems to ease the reader into appreciating what is essentially a hard to believe a story.
Frankenstein presents  us with a chinese box style narrative – this means that  there are narrations within nararration. This style of narrator creats  a lot of meaning and Also helps to foresahadow the events within  the novel.one of the main effect this style of narration has on the narrative , is it makes it unreliable . we are told different versions  of the same story and what we are told by Walton is third person. Before meeting the delacey’s he was inarticulate and childlike.similarly it is difficult for the reader to fully accept victors version of events. Victor throughout the novel .,brought the label of mad upon himself . he secluded himself and obessed over unconventional things . the people around him picked up on these things and thought he was psychotic. From erratic  mood wrings to depression, there was  a sense of insanity that was associated with victor throughout the novel. As an omniscient reader, we understand that he has reason for his depression and crazy mood swing; but there is still an underlying sense of madness that made him fixated with such unconventional interests. Shelly chose to use this style of the narration.
There are a lot of ideas about why shelly chose to use this style of narrators. Victor says he wants to ‘penetrate the secrets of nature’-clarifying that science is all about trying to find out how the worldworks. In this sense, it could be said that victor is trying to adopt the roll of god …all knowing, and all seeing. by having multiple narrators , it is the reader that becomes all-knowing and all seeing , highlighting how victor is fighting  a losing battle against science. Another idea, in keeping with the theme of science, is the idea offoreshadowing. The narrative is put together from a collection ofvoices, not of which would hold any real significance on their own. When victor is creating his monster he uses stolen body parts and stitches them together .one missing body part and creature would be incomplete. The same goes for the narratives. If one voice is missing. Thestory wouldn’t make any sense. Science is about finding out how the world works; the idea of knowing everything .because of multiple narration s , the narration becomes restricted for everyone expect the reader. In doing this, shelly is allowing the reader to play the role of the scientist forcing us to piece the narrations together to find out the truth.
Victor and creature have separate narration, just as they have separate narrations just as they have separate lives. Victor created the creature, and so therefore had the responsibility to take in the roes of the mother; the protector instead of facing up to what he had done, he ran away from his responsibilities and left the creature to fend for himself. Victor and creature going their separate ways reflect their separate narrative. The only narrators we have are victor. The creature and Walton. We do not receive the narrative voice of the female we shows the objectification of women, trues to that of the time period –long before the feminist movement.
                                                                                                                                                                Thank You... 

to evaluate my assignment click here


No comments:

Post a Comment