Paper-4  Shri Aurobindo's views on Education

to evalute my assignment cick here.

Name; Gohil Umaba B

         Paper no :- 4 Indian writing in English

         Topic :- Sri Aurobindo’s views on education

Sri aurobindo; education which will after the tools where by one can live for divine the country for oneself and for others and this must be the ideal of every school which calls itself national.

According to some learned people the word education has been derived from the Latin term educatum which means the act of teaching ortraining..A groupof educationalist say that it has come from another Latin word educare which means to bring up or to rise

Sri Aurobindo was born in Calcutta on 15 august 1872 at the age of seven he was taken to England for education and in1890 went up to king’s college Cambridge. Here he stood in first class and also passed the final examination for the Indian civil service. He worked for the next 13 years princely state of the Broada in the maharaja and professor in Baroda College. Sri Aurobindo had begun the practice of yoga in 1905 in Baroda.

 Renaissance is new  birth in India if it is a fact must becomea thing of immense importance both to herself and the world because of all that is meant for her in the recovery or the change of her time old spirit and national ideals to the world because of the possibilities involved in the rearising of the force that is in many respects unlike any other and it’s from the mentality and spirit that they have hitherto governed the modern idea in mankind although not so far  away perhaps from that which is preparing to govern the future  . European culture is a turning point .it was first applied that was not so much a reawakening as an overturn and reversal a seizure of Christianisedfeudalised Europe by the old graeceo Latin spirit and from with all the complex and momentous result which came from it .

   Critical pedagogy includes relationships between teaching and learning. Itsproponent’s claims that it is a continuous process of what they call unlearning and relearning, reflection, evaluation and the impact that these action have on the student in particular student whom they believe have been historically and continue to be disenfranchised by what they call traditional schooling. 

   Sri Aurobindo has been widely acclaimed as a modern seer and a Vedic scholar he had headed the first national college of education of Calcutta and had written extensively on subject ofeducation. His approach to integral education   is in itself a unique concept education of the body, mind spirits are each expoused in his writings on education but theirintegration is even more significant. He has also dwelt on the social and psychological aspects of education. His thought has been put to practice at Sri Aurobindo ashrams the auroville and several other school of the country.

  The first principle of teaching is that nothing can be taught this statement of Sri Aurobindo is intellectual approach to education it puts learning above teaching. It makes learning a self-starting, self-propelling process it redefines the role of teacher from mere possessor of information to a facilitator and guide for the learner. I am not aware of any other profound statement in teaching which has such a permanent validity. I wish to quote sriaurobindo here to reflect the wide horizon of his perception education in its international dimension on the one hand that of the external human values on  the other. The world state will give its in habitants the great adventures of peace economic wellbeing general security the intellectual cultural, social activity and progress. None of these are in themselves sufficient to create the thing needed. For the certain psychological elements would have to be present in great strength

                                                              

      First as a religion of the humanitymuch more powerful, explicit, self-conscious universal in nationalist religion of the country secondly clear recognition by man in all his thought and life of a single soul of humanity of which each man and each people is an incarnation and soul form, thirdly an ascension of men beyond the principle and arrangement of the common life which would give free play to individual variation by which the soul of man’s lives and grows great.

His expectation from education are loud able and at the same time they reflect an ideal to be pursued .it reflects the value of a modern world not scuttled by narrow perception and drab materialism it throws light on several other aspects of education which deserve intensive analyses discourse and validation

Adventure in consciousness

The Indianpsychebelieved that man is only one of the numerous manifestation of primary cause but we cannot fully understand him if as an independentphenomenon. He as well as everything else can be understood only when we understand that from which everything emerges.

  The process of education was set into motion to create  the necessary climate for a proper ripening of man and intuition  necessity and curiosity demand of environment and quest for the meaning of life all contributing to it. If the process of evolution itself is movement of consciousness realising its own freedom from its bondage to material and other limitations and 20^th century the era we are leaving behind has witnessed the most momentous events and ideas ensuring greater freedom for man in several floats

Sri Aurobindobelieves that the realisation of such a freedom is not only a possibility but also certainly inherent in the very nature of evolutionary development. The true role of education is in preparing and helping man to arrive there at a new phase of evolution.

Man must aspire to go beyond his intellectual,

But the first the spirits ascent we must be achieve

Out of the charm from which our natural roes

The soul must soar sovereign above the form.

Our heart we must infirm with heavenly strength.

Surprise the animal with the occult god

Then kindling the god tongue of sacrifice,

Calling the powers of a bright hemisphere

                                   _ Sri aurobindo

Sri aurobindo startle’s us by saying that the first thing is a teacher must know is that nothing can be taught .the paradox is not meant to be an enigma he  emphasis the need for natural and spontaneous growth of the child. All knowledge in its scope but would make the whole trend and aim and the permeating spirit not mere worldly efficiency but this self-developing and self-finding.

                  Nationalism

It was Sri Aurobindos influence on the Indian national congress in the first decade of the century which made the organisation include swadeshi boycott and national education in its programme. The fundamental weakness of our Indian educational system is that the Indian student cannot bring his education into any direct relation with the world in which outside the class or lecture room he continues to live.. For that world is still the old Indian world of his forefathers and it is as far removed as the poles asunder from the western world which claims his education.

          We are sometimes asked what on the earth we mean by spirituality in art and poetry or in political and social life a confession of ignorance strange enough in any Indian mouth at this stage of our national history we have really an echo of the European idea that are to entirely different things and have  each to be pursued on its own entirely separate   lines and in obedience to its own entirely separate principle

         India can best develop herself and serve humanity by being herself and following the law of her own nature. Thisdoes not means as some narrowly and blindly suppose the rejection of everything new that comes to us in the stream time or happens to have been first developed or powerfully expressed by the west.necessariliy the new India will seek the same end in new ways under the vivid impulses of fresh and large ideas by an instrumentality suited to more complex conditions but the scope of her efforts and action and the suppleness and variety of her mind will not be less but greater than of old. Spirituality is not necessarily exclusive it can be and in its fullness must be all inclusive

So with all our aims and activities, spirituality takes them all and given them a greater diviner,  more intimate sense.

“ What India needs especially at this moment is the aggressive virtues the spirit of soaring idealism , bold creation ,fearless resistance, courageous attack; of the tamasic spirit of inertia we have already too much .we need to cultivate another training and temperament another habit of mind’’.

Our calls is to young India it is the young who must be the builder of the new world mot those who accepts competitive individualism. According to auroboindo the education which starting with the past and making full use of the present builds up a great nation.

Aurobindo had little love for Britisheducation inIndia which he called a mercenary and soulless education and for its debilitating influence on the inmate’s possibilities of the Indian brain. In India he said students generally have great capacities as in every field he wanted India to crave out her own path courageously.

Thank you

to evalute my assignment cick here. 

Paper-3 Difference between Tragedy and Epic

to evalute my assignment click here.

       Name :- Gohil Umaba B

       Paper no :- 3 (Literary Criticism  & Theory)

Topic :- Difference between tragedy and epic

                                                   According to Aristotle there are numbers of similarities between tragedy and epic

                                      Epic poetry must maintain the unity of plot in this it is allied with tragedy against history. History tells us all that happened during the certain time period or to certain people and such it is often somewhatdisconnected. Epic poetry should focus on one particular story that remains as organic whole. Homer is an excellent example of such epic poet.

                                          Epic poetry shares many of elements of tragedy like tragedy. It should be either simple or complex and it should be either simple or complex and it should deal primarily either with the character or with the suffering six part of tragedy are all present in epic poetry. Epic poem can reasonably last as long as whole series of tragedies provided it can be presented in one hearing .the plot of an epic poem can be far more expansively because it is not limited by stage epic can jump back and forth between events happening at the same time in difference places in a way that would be impossible on a stage ..Epic poetry should be narrated in heroic meter while tragedy is normally spoken in iambic meter.

                      The main difference being that tragedy conveys all this by means of action while epic poetry does so many of language alone they deal in the same genre so the only difference are determined by the different limitations imposed by the different media of expression ,a tragedy for instances cannot be as long as epic nor can it portrays so many different happenings or get away with as many fantastic events on the other hand tragedy is more focused and epic poetry cannot make use of music or spectacle of stage performances.

 Tragedy is more realistic medium because we see everything in a tragedy happening .before our eyes the action is limited to realm of human possibilities .on the other hand epic poetry is a purely narrative medium imagination of the poet and listener. Most important to both is that they maintain unity of plot. Epic poetry by virtue of its length. Is more suited to episode and digression but these digression must be tied to plot as tightly as the fewer digression found in tragic poetry. Tragedy is performed before large audiences which result in melodramatic performance or over catting to please the crowds. Epic poetry is more cultivated than tragedy because it does not rely on gesture at all to convey its message

Tragedy is superior to epic poetry comes in three waves. First  he lists all the argument out mostly by showing they are livened against the performance  of tragedy rather than anything in genre itself third  he lists the advantages that tragedy has over epic poetry which can be boiled down to two main points

1.            Tragedy has all the elements of epic poetry

2.            Tragedy is more condensed and so has a more concentrated effect.

According to Aristotle both tragedy and epic are forms of imitation .tragedy imitation directly by means of mimesis and digesis while epic imitates solely by means of words , tragedy also imitates by means of spectacle .both epic and tragedy portray people better or greater than the average spectator.

Tragedy ideally has a single unified action which is often restricted to a specific time and place and a small and a number of character .while epic has a broader scope of coverage.

   One of the difference between tragedy and epic is length tragedy by its nature more concentrated and compact hence its size is much more limited than that of the epic the length of a tragedy is based on the principle that work must be short enough to be grasped as an artistic whole the time limits of the epics are not fixed. Epic relate a number of incidents happening simultaneously to different person at the same time .tragedy cannot show more than one incident happening at one place at one time . This is what gave rise to the concept of unity of place .Aristotle says is that tragedy cannot represent more than one incident at one time and then it cannot show incident happening at different place at the same time.

      Tragedy can make use of greater variety of metres while the epic has to content itself with the heroic metre the epic uses the mode of the narrative and tragedy the mode of the dramatic. The plot of epic as of tragedy must have unity yet within the overall unity the epic .allows for more and longer incidents than doe’s tragedy the epic allows multiplicity of stories which would be unthinkable in a tragedy. Tragedy has vividness which is absent in epic

Common characteristic of a tragic hero

The hero’s action result in an increase of self-awareness and knowledge

The hero is noble birth

The hero possesses a tragic flaw that eventually leads to his downfall

The hero’s down fall is a result of his own free choice .but his misfortune is not completely deserved .the hero’s death is not pure loss because it brings greater knowledge and awareness

The suffering of the hero must not be senseless; itmust have a meaning

The heroesof classical tragedies are usually, male an exception is Cleopatra from Antony and Cleopatra

Characteristic of an epic her

the circumstances of the hero’s birth are unusual.

The hero is reputed to be the son of a god

At the birth of the hero there is often an attempt to kill him. He may be kidnapped or sent away for his protection

The hero become aking

Epic hero is a super human. He is braver, stronger, smarter and cleverer than an ordinary man.

Aristotle concept of tragedy

         The tragic hero is aman of noble stature .he is perfect combined with strength. There is usually weakness, thehero’s down fall because of his own fault .the result of his on free choice

Catharsis is experienced where as in epic hero not gives up.

Tragic hero accepts his fate and gain wisdom whereas epic hero helped by god

Aristotle seems to be treat tragedy and epic largely similar .tragedy It seems is a more realistic medium .because we see everything in a tragedy happening before our eyes the action is limited to the realm of human possibilities Greek stagecraft became in caressingly complex allowing actors to fly about suspended from cranes and so on but too much of this would be absurd indeed Aristophanes the great comic poet made good comic use of such devices.

      Epic poetry on the other hand is a purely narrative medium and such a limited only by the imagination of the poet and listener because we have no help in visualizing events the epic poet can more easily recount the improbable  without disturbing us .Aristotle refers to the episode in the Iliadwhere Achilles chases hector three time around the walls of troy .homer makes no mention of the rest of a Greek army which presumably must have been sitting idly by watching the chase such a picture would immediately seems on stage but because homer can focus exclusively on the character of Achilles and hector .. We are liable not to notice this absurdity.

                  In spite of these differences Aristotle seems to think that epic poetry and tragedy can judge according to similar criteria .Aristotleaddresses a number of criticisms that can be levelled against poetry .First among this accusation that the events depicted are impossible .Aristotle lays out the general principle that a poet should always aim for convincing impossibilities in favour of an un convincing possibility.

                  Further not all poetry meant to be describing thing as they are. Some poets describe things as they ought to be and other write to accord themselves with popular opinion rather than realism. He advances several reasons for considering tragedy is superior. first it has all the element s of an epic poem and has also music and spectacle which the epic lacks secondssimply reading the play without performing it is already very potent .third tragedy is shorter suggesting that it is more compact and will have a more unity in tragedy as evidence by the fact that a number of tragedies can be extracted from one epic poem. the fact is Greek  tragedy  has produced number of master works and posterity suggests that no Greek epic poet after homer approached the great tragedies in term of quality , but this seems to be more of an argument in favour of tragedies that have been written rather than  favouring the genre in the abstract. 

to evalute my assignment click here.

Paper-2 Theme Of' 'Tom Jones'

to evaluate my assignment click here.

Name: Gohil umaba B

Paper no: 2 ( The Neoclassical Age)

Topic: theme of tom jones

Virtue   as a action rather than thought

Fielding contrast the concept of virtue expoused by character like square and thawackums with the virtue actually practised by jones and allworthy. Tom as the active hero who saves damsels in distressand plans on the fighting for his country is the embodiments of the very active type of virtue that fielding esteems.

The impossibility of stereotypical categorisation

Fielding’s novel attempts to break down numerous boundaries in term of genre fielding cannot decide whether his novel is philosophical history a romance or an epee comic prosaic poem yet through these confounded musing fielding subtly suggest that cataloguing fiction is silly and that he found rather than think of himself as the founder of new province of writing In another example of broken stereotype fielding character cannot be distinguished bymasculine feminine traits  in this novel both menand women both fight cry.

Human nature

The narrator explains to the reader in the opening chapter that human nature is the main provision on offer. He does not intend to make any judgement on human nature much of athe criticism on tom jones was in responses to the licentious behaviour of character such as molly seagrimeMrs.water and lady bellaston fielding was not advocating any of the immoral behaviours of this character but merely presenting their actions as a steps on the road to greater wisdom. Molly seagrime is passionate and lusty young women she bewitches tom into his first sexual experience and attempts to ensnare him as protector by having his child when tom knows that he is not the father of her child molly finally settles with the partridge. At the end of the novel. So ends up with someone to love and support her.

Hypocrisy

In the novel we see hypocrisy as the most pernicious and damaging. The novel highlights hypocrisy across the social spectrum through the lens of humour .goody seagrime condemns. Molly for falling pregnant yet it is revealed that she gave  birth  within a week of her own marriage future we discover later that she shared in the profits of iniquity with her daughter after molly’s relationship with Mr.square  is exposed .the hypocrisy of the lower class is future illustrated when fair molly is viciously attacked un church yard  after attending church in affine dress

Squire western changes his attitude to tom depending upon how he perceives the Youngman’s circumstances. Fielding illustrates the danger of double standards through even the best character. Allworthy resolves to favour blifil not because he has faith in Youngman’s character but because he is not favoured by others.

Marriage

Fielding began the novel after the death of his first wife charlotte Cradock and his deep affection for her is embodiment in the character of Sophia. The institution of marriage is like books other issues. Explored through each strata of society. We see mgrs. Partridge and the envenomed wrath with which she attacks her husbands after hearing the speculation that he has made jenny jones pregnant. This reflects the anger Mr.fitzpatrick Feels for the lieutenant who is more engaged by his wife’s wit than by his own.

Morality and Ethics

There’s some serious stuff going on like big moral issues. According to squire allwarthy there are to ways to be immoral imprudence and villainy they’re very different.

Tom’s imprudent: too much drinking too much spending too much sex etc…this gets him into sticky situation that are for the most part hilarious. But then there’s villa nary and villainy is serious bizniz because it permanently points your character to dark side .so while tom has made some serious mistake as long as he changes his tunes all’s forgiven always a villain.

Future

Fortune is personified in the text as if it is a physical entity or active constituent of the plot it is not viewed as supernatural force. Fielding goes to great pains to condemn the use of supernatural devices as a simple solution to challenges of plot or characterization. Fortune describes how characters own qualities are projected into events and situation. Allworthy is described as the favourite of both nature and fortune

Wisdom

Wisdom is tom ultimate goal even if even if he does not initially realize it once he attains wisdom. He reaches end of his journey and path is open towards Sophia. His relation with molly teaches him that women may not be constant.Nightingale teaches tom how to navigate polite society and he is rescued from penury by the intervention of friends he had loyally supported.

Money wealth and greed

Money and the temptations it offers affects most  of the story part of toms  virtue that he is blissfully ignorant of the greed and negativity which the desire for money can inspire  when he leaves paradise hall he is given money by allworthy but  he loses it..

The most important example of greed comes through blifil both he and his father are undone by their greed. Captain Blifil dies of an apoplexy as he lust over his brother in laws lands because of his greed he dismissed his brother following the match with Bridget.

.                   The tension between art and artifice

Although the narrator upholds the value of natural art in his character, he uses artifice himself in the construction of his novel. Forexample he often closes chapters by hinting to the reader that is to fallow in the next chapter or he warns the reader that he is going to omit a scene. In such away he prevents us from suspending our disbelief and giving over self-up to the art of narrative instead fielding constantly entices us to reflect on the review the process of construction.

Contrast in verities of life

Henry fielding work presents slice of life and in doing so it naturally presents all the natural verities of living too. This becomes a major theme because it is apparent at more than one place. Not only are the characters contrasted but also situations human reactions and even a predicament. It is through these contrasted that fielding manages to paint a realistic picture of life this picture is believable and exciting all atonce, and owing to this theme is carried forth to the every end when tom jones blifil are contrasted yet again.

Epic journey towards manhood

The central themes of the novel are the amusing epic journey of tom jones towards maturation,self-realisation and union with his beloved. jones begins hisjourney as a mischievous adolescent, continues as an adventurous and reckless teenager and concludes it as a mature morally uprights adults settle down as a husband thehero confronts perils and undergone trails before completing his journey in this respect fielding hero is like  the hero of homers odyssey, he great epic poem recounting the adventures of Odysseus on his way home after a Trojan war.

Love

Tom jones love for Sophia thwarted at first his own behaviour and the action of others ,continueous to burn within him after squire all worthy banishes him after tom determines to win her back his love for her becomes the primary motive in everything he does even when he becomes  the plaything of  lady

Deceit

Bridget the mother of tom hires jenny jones to pretend to be mother. Blifil learns after the death of his mother that she was also the mother of tom jones but he pretends to know nothing of a matter while continuing demean his half-brother.

Lack of self-control

Many of the characters act out like the emotion or desire of the movement without regard the morality or consequence of theiraction. Tom, bridgeallworthy, molly seagrime, lady Ballston, mr.fitzpatrick and black George are among the characters that have lack self-mastery.

Thank you

to evaluate my assignment click here.

Character of Hamlet

Paper No-1 Character of Hamlet

to evalute my assignment click here

Name: Gohil umaba B

Paper no: 1-The Renaissance Age

Topic:- Character of hamlet

                 Hamlet is the prince of Denmark the title character and protagonist about thirty years old at the start of the play ,hamlet is son of queen Gertrude and the late king hamlet and the nephew of present king Claudius .hamlet is melancholy ,bitter and cynical full of hate red for his uncles scheming and dis gust for his mother’s sexuality . A reflective and thoughtful young man who has studied atthe university of Wittenberg,. Hamlet is often intensive and hesitance but at the other times prone to rash and impulsive acts, hamlet is arguably the greatest dramatic character ever created from the moment we meet the crestfallen prince we are enraptured by his elegant intensity .shrouded in his inky cloak, hamlet is man of radical contradiction he is recalls yet cautious, courteous yet uncivil, tender yet ferocious. He meets his father’s death with consuming outrage and righteous indignation, yet show no computation when he himself is responsible for the deaths of the meeting Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and the pontificating lord chamber linePolonius. he uses the fragile and innocent Ophelia as an outlet for his disgust towards the queen and cannot comprehend that his own vicious words have caused her insanity hamlet is full of faults .but how is it that even seemingly negative qualities such asinfectiveness, hastiness, hate brutality and obsession can enhance hamlets position as a tragic hero a prince among men? To answer these questions we must journey with hamlet from beginning to end examine the many facets of his character.

Our first impression of hamlet sets  the tone for the whole plays even without Shakespeare providing an elaborate description of hamlet features we can envision his pale face and intense brooding eyes .dressed totally in black , hamlet displays all the forms ,moods and the shapes of grief . his mother cannot help but notice hamlets outward appearance of mourning but hamlet makes it clear that the overt signs of  of grief do not come close to conveying how much sorrow he feels inside .

For they are the actions that a man might play,

But I have that within which passes show

These but the trapping and suits of woe.

Hamlet cannot forget his father even when all those around him have resumed their merry lives content to offer the occasional conciliatory words of wisdom. The queen considering she has lost a husband offers up the rather unhelpful

Thou knows tis common all that lives must die passing through nature to eternity and Claudius adds amongst other things we pray you throw to earth this unrevealing woe and think of us as a father, hamlet hamlet s tremendous grief is intensified by this lack of feeling by those around him and more significantly by the cold hearted action of his mother who married her brother in laws within a month of her husband’sdeath .This act of treachery by Gertrude whom hamlet obviously loves greatly at one type rapes the very fabric of hamlet’s being

Hyperion to a satyr, so loving to my mother,

That he might not be teem the winds of heaven

Visit her face too roughly heaven and earth

The respect and awe hamlet has for his father is seen in above passage as the prince compares that late king to Hyperion’s anti thesis the satyr , a creature half goat and half man known for its drunken and lustful behaviour the behaviour of the new king Claudius it is no wonder  then that hamlet develops disgust for not only Claudius the man but all of the behaviours and excesses associated with Claudius .hamlet begins to find revelry of any kind unacceptable ,but particularly he loathes drinking and sensual dancing . As they await the ghost on the castle wall, hamlet hears the king engaging in merriment down below and tells horatio that the whole world is feeling the same contempt for his drunken countrymen;

 This heavy headed revel east and west

Makes ustraduced and tax d of other nations

They clepe us drunkards, and with swinish phrase

Soil our addition and indeed it takes

From our achievements though performed at height, the pith and marrow of our attribute.

It is unfortunate for the innocent Ophelia that the actions of Claudius and Gertrude have also tainted forever hamlets thoughts and feelings towards the women. based on the letters and gifts hamlet gave his one cherished Ophelia .it is apparent that he did love the girl and likely felt those feelings of sweet devotion that his father felt for his mother, but whether due to some overwhelming desire to become to mouth piece for his father who cannot himself chastise his traitorous wife or due to the sad fact that all the love in him has truly dried up hamlet turns on Ophelia and destroys her with cruelty almost unimaginable

Various interpretations

Hamlet – best reflects the universality of the dramatist geniuses it remains an enigmatical work what has been called grand political puzzle and monalisa of literature

Hamlet has caused more discussion than any other character in fiction dramatic or non-dramatic

Hamlet the victim of external difficulties

Claudius was too powerful and only once before the final scene placed himself in a defenceless position

How could hamlet convince the people that he justifiably has executed revenge?

Hamlet the victim of excessive melancholy

The hasty marriage of his mother –his moral nature receives a terrible shock and his whole mind is poisoned  a nature morally corrupt would have felt it less keenly but in the case of hamlet it comes as a terrible shock and leaves behind a boundless weariness and sick longing for death.. He becomes subject to melancholia and depression .he grows sarcastic, callous and bitter incentive even to the feeling of those he loved .the prince melancholy is the very centre of the play and the cause of tragedy in it.

Hamlet is victim of Oedipus complex

Dr. ernest jones – disciple and biographer of Sigmund freud concisely stated in hamlet Oedipus the prince  of Denmark suffered from the Oedipus complex an undue and unhealthy attachment of son for his mother which is apt to be morbidly suppressed and cause great mental distresses .

Hamlet is sentimental dreamer

According to some critics,

Gothe- hamlet is Youngman of lovely, pure and moral nature without the strength of nerve which forms hero

Coleridge – hamlet suffers from an over balance of the contemplative faculty and like any man there by becomes the creature of mere meditation and loses his power to action.

Hamlet has fascinated audience and readers for centuries and the first thing to point out about him is that he is enigmatic. There is always more to him than the other characters in the play can figure out even the most careful and clever readers come away with the sense that they don’t know everything there is to know about his character. It is also important to note that hamlet is extremelymelancholy and discontented with the state of affairs in Denmark and his own family. Hamlet is ready to confront the paradoxical truth that to avenge his father’s death he must commit the very same act for which he seeks revenge .using fate as the scapegoat ,hamlet can distance himself from the act of Claudius .when hamlet does finally die it is princely qualities that make the lasting imprint in our minds .

 to evalute my assignment click here

My Presentation

1) Paper No.-1 ( The Renaissance Literature)

     Topic :- Dramatists Of Elizabethan Age

     

      to evalute my presention click here.

Dramatist of Elizabethan Age from umabagohil

to evalute my presention click here

2) Paper-2 (The Neovlassical Age)
     Topic:- Gulliver as a Middleclass Man.
to evalute my presention click here

gullivertaravels from umabagohil

to evalute my presention click here

3) Paper No.-3 (Literary Theory &  Criticism)
    Topic :- Coleridge's view on Poem and Poetry.

     to evalute my presention click here

Coleridge views on poem and poetry from umabagohil
   to evalute my presention click here

4) Paper-4 (Indian Writing in English)
     Topic :-The  Fakeer of Jungheera Plot Overview

     to evalute my presention click here

fakeer of jungheera from umabagohil

to evalute my presention click here